[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Real-Time Preemption and RCU
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:17:27AM -0800, Bill Huey wrote:
> > A notion of priority across a quiescience operation is crazy anyways[-,-] so
> > it would be safe just to use to the old rwlock-semaphore "in place" without
> > any changes or priorty handling add[i]tions. The RCU algorithm is only concerned
> > with what is basically a coarse data guard and it isn't time or priority
> > critical.
> A little jitter in a quiescence operation isn't going to hurt things right ?.

The only thing that I can think of that can go wrong here is what kind
of effect it would have on the thread write blocking against a bunch of
RCU readers. It could introduce a chain of delays into, say, a timer event
and might cause problems/side-effects for other things being processed.
RCU processing might have to decoupled processed by a different thread
to avoid some of that latency weirdness.

What do you folks think ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.089 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site