lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][alpha] "pm_power_off" [drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.ko] undefined!
Pawe__ Sikora <pluto@pld-linux.org> wrote:
>
> Fix for modpost warning:
> "pm_power_off" [drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.ko] undefined!
>
> --- linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c.orig 2005-03-13 07:44:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c 2005-03-15 23:20:00.405832368 +0100
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(alpha_using_srm);
> #endif /* CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC */
>
> +#include <linux/pm.h>
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off);
> +
> /* platform dependent support */
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(strcat);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(strcmp);
> --- linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c.orig 2005-03-13 07:44:40.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c 2005-03-15 23:28:15.687538104 +0100
> @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(machine_power_off);
>
> +void (*pm_power_off)(void) = machine_power_off;
> +
> /* Used by sysrq-p, among others. I don't believe r9-r15 are ever
> saved in the context it's used. */

There doesn't seem to be a lot of point in defining it and not using it.

Perhaps IPMI is making untoward assumptions about the architecture's power
management? Should we instead be disabling CONFIG_IPMI_POWEROFF on alpha
(and others?)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:0.253 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site