Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:23:14 +0100 | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: Repeatable IDE Oops for 2.6.11 (ide-scsi vs ide-cdrom) |
| |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:27:54 -0500, Paul <set@pobox.com> wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>, on Fri Mar 18, 2005 [05:34:06 PM] said: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:55:08 -0500, Paul <set@pobox.com> wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > > > Here is what I did: > > > > > > # modprobe ide-scsi > > > # cd /proc/ide/hdd (this is a dvdrw drive) > > > # cat driver > > > > ide-cdrom version 4.61 > > > # echo ide-scsi > driver > > > # cat driver > > > > ide-scsi (something--- didnt note exactly, except it was ide-scsi) > > > # echo ide-cdrom > driver > > > > > > The shell is killed and Oops. > > > > > > Machine flakey and half alive at this point. Reboot with Alt-sysrq. > > > The same thing works with 2.6.10, without Oops. > > > > Please see http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/11/132 > > Hi; > > What is the nature of the 'ide-dev-2.6 tree'? Are there broken > out patches available I can test vs. 2.6.11 or -mm? How do the 'ide fixes'
it is BK tree which is pulled into -mm, no patches against vanilla kernels (yet)
> in -ac intersect with ide-dev? I am also curious if these patches could
locking 'ide fixes' in -ac are another approach to the same problem
> have any effect on the pktcdvd problems I have reported.[*]
This issue looks like pktcdvdv/udf specific thing so these patches won't help.
> Thanks for the feedback. > > Paul > set@pobox.com > > * http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/2005-Mar/0001.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |