Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:37:44 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering |
| |
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > If we want a calming period, we need to do development like 2.4.x is > done today. It's sane, understandable and it works.
No. It's insane, and the only reason it works is that 2.4.x is a totally different animal. Namely it doesn't have the kind of active development AT ALL any more. It _only_ has the "even" number kind of things, and quite frankly, even those are a lot less than 2.6.x has.
> 2.6.x-pre: bugfixes and features > 2.6.x-rc: bugfixes only
And the reason it does _not_ work is that all the people we want testing sure as _hell_ won't be testing -rc versions.
That's the whole point here, at least to me. I want to have people test things out, but it doesn't matter how many -rc kernels I'd do, it just won't happen. It's not a "real release".
In contrast, making it a real release, and making it clear that it's a release in its own right, might actually get people to use it.
Might. Maybe.
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |