[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.11

    On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Matthias Andree wrote:
    > doesn't seem to carry a crypto
    > signature for the patch, patch-2.6.11.gz.sign

    It's there now (along with the ChangeLog).

    The signatures are automatically generated at the master site, and the
    mirroring out to the public sites is a separate event, so sometimes (if
    you check early) you may miss the signatures for a while until the next
    time the scripts run.

    The same is true of the .bz2 files, btw (I only upload the .gz ones, the
    rest is generated). And obviously the incremental patches.

    (In contrast the full ChangeLog was missing because the generation script
    I use is not exactly the smart way, so it's O(slow(n)), where slow is n**3
    or worse, so the log from the last -rc release is fast, but going back all
    the way to 2.6.10 took long long enough that I didn't wait for it).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.046 / U:7.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site