lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 16 Mar 2005 01:15:10 -0800
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> 
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > Damn! The answer was right there in front of my eyes! Here's the
> > cleanest solution. I forgot about wait_on_bit_lock.  I've converted
> > all the locks to use this instead. [...]
> 
> ah, indeed, this looks really nifty. Andrew?
> 

There's a little lock ranking diagram in jbd.h which tells us that these
locks nest inside j_list_lock and j_state_lock.  So I guess you'll need to
turn those into semaphores.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2008