[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] del_timer_sync: proof of concept

* Oleg Nesterov <> wrote:

> New rules:
> ->_base & 1 : is timer pending
> ->_base & ~1 : timer's base

how would it look like if we had a separate timer->pending field after
all? Would it be faster/cleaner?

(we dont need to keep them small _that_ bad - if there's a good reason
we should rather add a clean new field than to encode two fields into
one field and complicate the code.)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.050 / U:6.200 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site