Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: User mode drivers: part 1, interrupt handling (patch for 2.6.11) | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:33:31 +0000 |
| |
On Llu, 2005-03-14 at 00:02, Peter Chubb wrote: > I can see there'd be problems if the code allowed shared interrupts, > but it doesn't.
If you don't allow shared IRQ's its useless, if you do allow shared IRQ's it deadlocks. Take your pick 8)
As to your comment about needing to do a few more I/O operations I agree. However if your need is for speed then you might want to just write a small IRQ helper module for the kernel or extend the syntax I proposed a little (its conveniently trivial to generate native code from this).
There isn't much you can do about the status read without MWI on most chip designs (some get it right by posting status to system memory but not many)
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |