[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: User mode drivers: part 1, interrupt handling (patch for 2.6.11)
    On Llu, 2005-03-14 at 00:02, Peter Chubb wrote:
    > I can see there'd be problems if the code allowed shared interrupts,
    > but it doesn't.

    If you don't allow shared IRQ's its useless, if you do allow shared
    IRQ's it deadlocks. Take your pick 8)

    As to your comment about needing to do a few more I/O operations I
    agree. However if your need is for speed then you might want to just
    write a small IRQ helper module for the kernel or extend the syntax I
    proposed a little (its conveniently trivial to generate native code from

    There isn't much you can do about the status read without MWI on most
    chip designs (some get it right by posting status to system memory but
    not many)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.021 / U:15.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site