[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] break_lock forever broken

    > Yes that's the tradeoff. I just feel that the former may be better,
    > especially because the latter can be timing dependant (so you may get
    > things randomly "happening"), and the former is apparently very low
    > overhead compared with the cost of taking the lock. Any numbers,
    > anyone?

    as I said, since the cacheline just got dirtied, the write is just half
    a cycle which is so much in the noise that it really doesn't matter.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.018 / U:1.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site