[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: nvidia fb licensing issue.
    Dave Jones <> wrote:
    > The nvidia framebuffer code added recently is marked as
    > MODULE_LICENSE(GPL), but some things seem a little odd to me..
    > 1. The boilerplate at the top of drivers/video/nvidia/nv_dma.h,
    > drivers/video/nvidia/nv_local.h, and drivers/video/nvidia/nv_hw.c
    > doesn't seem to be a GPL-compatible license. It seems to be an nvidia
    > specific license with an advertising clause, and something that
    > adds restrictions on rights of U.S. Govt end users.
    > 2. Some of these files clearly came from XFree86 judging from
    > the CVS idents in the source. Was this XFree86 code
    > dual-licensed by its original authors ? If so, it isn't clear.


    clear things up?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.021 / U:12.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site