[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: inappropriate use of in_atomic()
        > Consequently the use of in_atomic() in the below files is probably
    > deadlocky if CONFIG_PREEMPT=n:
    > drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c

    Thanks for pointing this out. I'll get you a patch in the next day or
    two. As you can probably tell, the code is just trying to decide
    whether to use GFP_ATOMIC or GFP_KERNEL to allocate a couple of
    things, depending on what context we're being called from. So at
    worst we can just change to GFP_ATOMIC unconditionally.

    I'll check into whether we can do something cleverer, but just going
    the GFP_ATOMIC route won't be horrible.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.019 / U:25.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site