Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] -stable, how it's going to work. | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:51:48 -0500 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 09:43 -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > * Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 08:43 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > That, and a zillion other specific wordings that people suggested fall > > > under the: > > > or some "oh, that's not good" issue > > > rule. > > > > So just to be 100% clear, no sound with 2.6.N where the sound worked > > with 2.6.N-1 absolutely does qualify. Right? > > Depends, is listening to music while you work critical...? j/k ;-) > Yeah, that's a driver regression...used to work, now it's broken. > If fix is back out all changes, that's not so nice, if it's a > 'one-liner' then definitely. Have a concrete example and patch?
Not yet. We are still trying to figure out whether 2.6.11 introduced an ALSA regression or not. See the "intel 8x0 went silent" thread.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |