Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:57:29 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume |
| |
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to > > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)? > > I did: > > --- /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-05 20:57:03.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-06 19:07:39.000000000 +0100 > @@ -871,6 +869,7 @@ > restore_processor_state(); > restore_highmem(); > device_power_up(); > + touch_softlockup_watchdog(); > local_irq_enable(); > return error; > } > > and it still complains, but the call trace is now different:
could you describe the timings a bit more - how long it takes to do the resume, and when does the watchdog print out its warning. Is it a single warning only, and once the resume succeeds, the watchdog doesnt complain anymore, correct?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |