Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PPC/PPC64: Abstract cpu_feature checks. | Date | Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:57:34 +0100 |
| |
On Sünndag 06 Februar 2005 04:26, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Abstract most manual mask checks of cpu_features with cpu_has_feature() > Just to get back to the point of consistant naming: In case we do the other proposed changes as well, is everyone happy with the following function names?
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_X) cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features & CPU_FTR_X cpu_feature_possible(CPU_FTR_X) CPU_FTR_POSSIBLE_MASK & CPU_FTR_X
fw_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_X) cur_cpu_spec->fw_features & FW_FTR_X
platform_is(PLATFORM_X) systemcfg->platform == PLATFORM_X platform_possible(PLATFORM_X) PLATFORM_POSSIBLE_MASK & PLATFORM_X platform_compatible(PLATFORM_X) systemcfg->platform & PLATFORM_X
It's not as consistant as I'd like it to be, but it's the best I could come up with.
Arnd <>< [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |