Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:28:39 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages |
| |
Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: > > In my understanding, what Andrew Morton said is "If target functionality can > implement in user space only, then we should not modify the kernel-tree".
fork, exec and exit upcalls sound pretty good to me. As long as
a) they use the same common machinery and
b) they are next-to-zero cost if something is listening on the netlink socket but no accounting daemon is running.
Question is: is this sufficient for CSA? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |