lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
From
Date
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
> The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and
> ideological, than real.

I've never used BK (not allowed to), but some things I've read about it
sound quite annoying. For instance:

* Every source tree contains your entire repository => massive disk usage

* Must "unlock" files before working on them ("bk edit"); I recall
doing this with RCS, and it was, well, a real pain.

-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Ghandi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.194 / U:5.848 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site