Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed | Date | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:56:46 -0500 |
| |
On Monday 21 February 2005 00:43, Miles Bader wrote: > "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> writes: > > The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and > > ideological, than real. > > I've never used BK (not allowed to), but some things I've read about it > sound quite annoying. For instance: > > * Every source tree contains your entire repository => massive disk usage
It's not too bad as you just hardlink most of the trees to their parent.
> * Must "unlock" files before working on them ("bk edit"); I recall > doing this with RCS, and it was, well, a real pain.
I think there is a setting to have them checked out for editing automatically.
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |