lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Should kirqd work on HT?
From
Date
Hi Jeff.

On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> What are the results of running irqbalanced?

You mean the debugging output? I can reenable it and record the results
if that's what you mean.

>From memory though, it got to not_worth_the_effort via this code:

if (tmp_loaded == -1) {
/* In the case of small number of heavy interrupt sources,
* loading some of the cpus too much. We use Ingo's original
* approach to rotate them around.
*/
if (!first_attempt && imbalance >= useful_load_threshold) {
rotate_irqs_among_cpus(useful_load_threshold);
return;
}
goto not_worth_the_effort;
}


(arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c:449.

Regards,

Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com

Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.244 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site