Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:57:51 -0500 (EST) | | Subject | Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed | | From | "Sean" <> |
| |
On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:49 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said:
> You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise.
This isn't true unfortunately, a lot of information is lost in cvs. file deletes, renames etc.. Plus, the implementation from Bitkeeper is lacking, (eg. combining many changes into one).
> > Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are > using BK. And you are free to update your local tree with > CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument.
Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest that it be opened up to the public :o) Just that the flow of information wouldn't all have to originate in bk to make it into head (ie. bk could pull changes from head too).
Cheers, Sean.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |