lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 18 Feb 2005 14:57:51 -0500 (EST)
SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
From"Sean" <>
On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:49 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said:

> You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise.

This isn't true unfortunately, a lot of information is lost in cvs. file
deletes, renames etc.. Plus, the implementation from Bitkeeper is
lacking, (eg. combining many changes into one).

>
> Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are
> using BK. And you are free to update your local tree with
> CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument.

Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest that it be opened up to the public :o)
Just that the flow of information wouldn't all have to originate in bk to
make it into head (ie. bk could pull changes from head too).

Cheers,
Sean.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2010