Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:26:18 -0500 | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed |
| |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST), Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> wrote: > On Fri, February 18, 2005 11:27 am, Theodore Ts'o said: > > > If you truly believe that BK would be able to add the value that it > > does to the kernel development process by using some other SCM as the > > master SCM, with BK being "underneath", as you proposed earlier, then > > you do not understand why BK is fundamentally better than the current > > open source SCM systems that are out there. > > BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as > you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the > community.
What is bk2cvs gateway that is maintained by Larry then? Just call it your "head" that Linus feeds from his BK repository and you are all set.
I can see that Roman and Stellian want something different, but we alerady have what you have just described.
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |