lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
    On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:30:47PM -0600, Tom Felker wrote:
    > I really think the fewer restrictions you put on BK's use, the less likely it
    > will be copied. When the open source community copies something, it's not out
    > of a desire to screw somebody over. It's because they had an itch, a
    > software need that couldn't easily be fulfilled otherwise, a demand.
    >
    > Apparently there is a demand for good SCM, and BK can satisfy this, and you've
    > done the very admirable thing of letting the open source community use BK at
    > no cost. But by putting such a heavy restriction on its use, you create a
    > large portion of the community who won't or can't use it, and who therefore
    > need a "copy" of it, which is exactly what you are trying to prevent.

    I fully agree.

    Josef "Jeff" Sipek
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.070 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site