[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /proc/*/statm, exactly what does "shared" mean?
Hi all,

Sorry for responding this email so late. I was busy with my trip.

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:42:15 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins <> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Richard F. Rebel wrote:
> >
> > That said, many mod_perl users are *VERY* interested in being able to
> > detect and observe how "shared" our forked children are. Shared meaning
> > private pages shared with children (copy on write). Is it even possible
> > to do this in 2.6 kernels? If so, any pointers would be very helpful.
> Not in any of the vanilla kernels.
> Mauricio has a /proc/<pid>/smaps patch, in which he returns to looking
> at every pte slot of every vma of the process as /proc/<pid>/statm did
> in 2.4. I suggest you ask him offline for his latest version (the last
> I saw did not include support for 2.6.11's pud level;
I put the pud level on the last patch I sent to the linux-kernel list
as suggested by Marcelo Tosatti.

> and looped in an
> inefficient way, repeatedly locating, mapping and unmapping the page
> table for each pte slot - needs refactoring into pgd_range, pud_range,
> pmd_range, pte_range levels like 2.4's statm).
Well, for each vma it is checked how many pages are mapped to rss. So
I have to check per page if it is allocated in physical memory. I know
that this is a heavy function, but do you have any suggestion to
improve this? What do you mean "needs refactoring into pgd_range,
pud_range, pmd_range, pte_range levels like 2.4's statm"? Could you
give more details, please?


Mauricio Lin.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.090 / U:6.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site