Messages in this thread | | | From | Witold Krecicki <> | Subject | Re: sil_blacklist - are all those entries necessary? | Date | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:29:10 +0100 |
| |
Dnia wtorek 15 luty 2005 17:52, napisałeś: > Witold Krecicki wrote: > > in sata_sil.c there is: > > sil_blacklist [] = { > > { "ST320012AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST330013AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST340017AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST360015AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST380023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST3120023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST3160023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST3120026AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST340014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST360014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST380011ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST3120022ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "ST3160021ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > > { "Maxtor 4D060H3", SIL_QUIRK_UDMA5MAX }, > > { } > > }; > > I've got ST3120026AS and I've been using it with SIL3112 without this > > hack for a long time - without any negative effects. The same impression > > on ST3200822AS - is there any way to check if it is REALLY necessary? > > 15MB/s is not what I'd expect on SATA... > > It's necessary until we can prove otherwise. Simply running well > without your drive in the blacklist means nothing -- you just haven't > hit the error condition yet. So how can I proove it? Are there any tests? It's been running for over a year, almost 24/7 and nothing... -- Witold Kręcicki (adasi) adasi [at] culm.net GPG key: 7AE20871 http://www.culm.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |