Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:52:07 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: sil_blacklist - are all those entries necessary? |
| |
Witold Krecicki wrote: > in sata_sil.c there is: > sil_blacklist [] = { > { "ST320012AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST330013AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST340017AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST360015AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST380023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST3120023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST3160023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST3120026AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST340014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST360014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST380011ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST3120022ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "ST3160021ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, > { "Maxtor 4D060H3", SIL_QUIRK_UDMA5MAX }, > { } > }; > I've got ST3120026AS and I've been using it with SIL3112 without this hack for > a long time - without any negative effects. The same impression on > ST3200822AS - is there any way to check if it is REALLY necessary? 15MB/s is > not what I'd expect on SATA...
It's necessary until we can prove otherwise. Simply running well without your drive in the blacklist means nothing -- you just haven't hit the error condition yet.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |