lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes
    From
    Date
    Hi.

    On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > Hi!
    >
    > > > > Andrew, if you get one big patch doing only type-safety (u32 ->
    > > > > pm_message_t, no code changes), would you still take it this late? I
    > > > > promise it is not going to break anything... It would help merge after
    > > > > 2.6.11 quite a lot...
    > > >
    > > > Problem is, such a megapatch causes grief for all those people who maintain
    > > > their own trees. It would be best, please, to split it into 10-20 bits and
    > > > send the USB parts to Greg and the SCSI bits to James, etc.
    > >
    > > Okay; I can do that if everyone is happy with the thing as a whole.
    > > Andrew, can I get your answer on Pavel's question - shall I just include
    > > the u32->pm_message_t part?
    >
    > Yes, I believe it is too late to do anything than u32->pm_message_t
    > conversion that changes no code...

    I guess I'm wrong then - I thought the other changes avoided compilation
    errors.

    Regards,

    Nigel
    --
    Nigel Cunningham
    Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
    http://www.cyclades.com

    Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.021 / U:30.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site