Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:09:50 +1100 |
| |
Hi.
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:04, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Andrew, if you get one big patch doing only type-safety (u32 -> > > > > pm_message_t, no code changes), would you still take it this late? I > > > > promise it is not going to break anything... It would help merge after > > > > 2.6.11 quite a lot... > > > > > > Problem is, such a megapatch causes grief for all those people who maintain > > > their own trees. It would be best, please, to split it into 10-20 bits and > > > send the USB parts to Greg and the SCSI bits to James, etc. > > > > Okay; I can do that if everyone is happy with the thing as a whole. > > Andrew, can I get your answer on Pavel's question - shall I just include > > the u32->pm_message_t part? > > Yes, I believe it is too late to do anything than u32->pm_message_t > conversion that changes no code...
I guess I'm wrong then - I thought the other changes avoided compilation errors.
Regards,
Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com
Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |