lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v. A2)
john stultz wrote:
> Interesting patch. Indeed, the trade off is just how quickly you want to
> boot vs how much drift you gain each suspend/resume cycle. Assuming all
> of the clocks are good, your patch could introduce up to 2 seconds of
> drift each suspend/resume cycle.

If we're not writing to the RTC on suspend, then I believe the drift is
capped. For some consumer products, 2 seconds of drift is OK.

Nigel, does the RTC get written to, or just read, on suspend?

Also, I'm worried about the clock appearing to run backwards over a suspend.
Unless a suspend/resume cycle took less than 1 second, I don't think this could
happen. Is that right?

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Electronics
=============================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans