lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
    Date
    On Friday, 9 December 2005 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
    > >>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> 09.12.05 12:20:05 >>>
    > >On Friday, 9 December 2005 10:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
    > >> It's a possible way to address this, but I'd rather just set a flag
    > >> indicating that the last-whatever values should not be considered
    > (to
    > >> get into a state just like after initial boot). Jan
    > >
    > >OK, but what is the interrupt handler supposed to do if the
    > >vxtime.last* values are invalid? I guess assume delta = 0?
    >
    > As I said, the state should be (re)set to whatever is in effect at
    > boot.
    >
    > >BTW, in the interrupt handler there is:
    > >
    > > __asm__("mulq %1\n\t"
    > > "shrdq $32, %%rdx, %0"
    > > : "+a" (delta)
    > > : "rm" (vxtime.tsc_quot)
    > > : "rdx");
    > >
    > >Is the "+a" a typo?
    >
    > Why would you think so?

    Well, "=" is usually used in that context and "+", "=" are on the same key. ;-)

    Rafael


    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-09 14:12    [W:0.022 / U:0.536 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site