![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 12/9/05, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > * Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote: > > > orig: > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 12636 49 760 13445 3485 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o > > > > patched: > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 11825 183 632 12640 3160 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o > > just a question - are you sure the measurements are accurate in this > case? The patch looks too small to shave more than 800 bytes off .text! > If it's real then something really wrong is going on in gcc-land ... > I did all this with an allyesconfig kernel source and then did : make net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o size net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o rm net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o then applied the patch and redid make net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o size net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.o So I believe the numbers should be correct, but I'm not at home atm, so I can't verify right now. I won't have a chance to look at it until tomorrow, but then I'll double-check. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-09 11:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||