Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:01:37 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare |
| |
* JANAK DESAI <janak@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> To answer Ingo's question, we did look at other flags when I started. > However, I wanted to keep the system call simple enough, with atleast > namespace unsharing, so it would get accepted. In the original > discussion on fsdevel, unsharing of vm was mentioned as useful so I > added that in addition to namespace unsharing.
i think the only sane way to do this is to support unsharing for all flags. Internally (i.e. in the patch-queue) it can still be structured in a finegrained way, but in terms of exposing it to applications, it should be an all or nothing solution i think.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |