lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
    From
    Date
    On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 14:18 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
    > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c), with struct device.firmware_data being where
    > the acpi_handle ends up. I guess there's no problem in moving my code
    > out to scsi-acpi.c and adding an arch_initcall for it. Would that be
    > more acceptable? The only problem then is working out a clean way of
    > setting up the notification structure.

    I would say your code belongs in the ACPI subtree. At most the core code
    wants to have the generic supporting functions for 'do a taskfile' and
    if need be to call an arch/platform resume function that any pm system
    can sensibly use.

    SCSI should not know detail about ACPI, APM or anything of that nature.

    Alan

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-08 15:37    [W:4.530 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site