[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/13] Time: Reduced NTP Rework (part 2)
On 5 Dec 2005 at 11:35, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Hi,
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, George Anzinger wrote:
> > In a discusson aroung the leapsecond and how to disable it (some folks don't
> > want the time jump) it came to light that, for the most part, this is unused
> > code. It requires that time be kept in UST to be useful and, from what I can
> > tell, most folks keep time in their local timezone, thus, effectively,
> > disableing the usage of the leapsecond correction (ntp figures this out and
> > just says "no"). Possibly it is time to ask if we should keep this in the
> > kernel at all.
> I'm thinking about moving the leap second handling to a timer, with the
> new timer system it would be easy to set a timer for e.g. 23:59.59 and
> then set the time. This way it would be gone from the common path and it
> wouldn't matter that much anymore whether it's used or not.

Will the timer solution guarantee consistent and exact updates?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-06 08:13    [W:0.155 / U:10.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site