lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ntp problems
On Monday 05 December 2005 19:14, john stultz wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:33 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 05 December 2005 16:39, john stultz wrote:
>> >On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 00:31 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> Greetings everybody;
>> >>
>> >> I seem to have an ntp problem. I noticed a few minutes ago that
>> >> if my watch was anywhere near correct, then the computer was about
>> >> 6 minutes fast. Doing a service ntpd restart crash set it back
>> >> nearly 6 minutes.
>> >
>> >Not sure exactly what is going on, but you might want to try
>> > dropping the LOCAL server reference in your ntp.conf. It could be
>> > you're just syncing w/ yourself.
>>
>> Joanne, bless her, pointed out that I had probably turned the ACPI
>> stuff in my kernel back on. She was of course correct, shut it off &
>> ntpd works just fine.
>
>Err. ACPI stuff? Could you elaborate? Sounds like you have some sort of
>bug hiding there.

This has been a relatively long standing problem, John. I think its
possibly related to some access path in the nforce2 chipset as it seems
to plague that chipset worse than others. But its long been, and I had
forgotten, that if ntpd didn't work, turning off the ACPI stuff was the
fix.

It had worked for a few kernel.org kernels and I had become complacent.
My mistake.

OTOH, calling it a local bug, no, I certainly wouldn't call it a local to
my machine bug. Jdow OTOH, running an FC4 box, has it enabled, and hers
is working just fine. She is I believe, running the FC4's latest kernel
too, so maybe the redhat people have massaged it. However, at one time
several months ago I believe she also had to have a grub argument
turning acpi=no.

There was a bunch of ntp related patches submitted recently, and I have
no idea which of them may have restored the broken acpi vs ntp scenario
to its formerly broken status, again.

Should it be looked at? Certainly, but I don't have the knowledge to do
so. So I build kernels, and report problems areas. The canary in the
coal mine so to speak. :-)

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.36% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-06 03:10    [W:0.068 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site