![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew wrote:
E. You send a _minimal_ patch ... prior
to going to Linus.
No! This isn't (for now at least) a fix. It's a nuke.
I don't want that "cpuset-change-marker-for-relative-numbering.patch"
going to Linus, because I am hesitating whether I even want that
"feature".
I want to nuke it now. You might see it again, fixed up, or you
might never see it again (I doubt you'll miss it ;). I don't
know yet.
Yes - the collisions resulting from removing this patch are easy to edit,
if that fits your style. If you hadn't removed the useless silly
zero initializers, I would have in my next set patches. It was on
my todo list, thanks to an earlier comment of yours.
So ... not E ;). What's your preference now?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-04 09:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||