![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>nt model (or at least they have no resources to >>do testing [Torvalds]) >>c) end-users (or those who are not kernel maintainers) are directed >>permanently to distros kernels and "stay away from kernel.org you >>wanna-bees! >> >> > >this is not what is being said. What is being said is that if you can't >deal with occasional breakage, you're better off using vendor kernels. >But.. if you can't deal with occasional breakage, you wouldn't test test >kernels EITHER. If you can deal with an occasional breakage, I hope you >and everyone else who can, will run and test kernel.org kernels, >especially the -rc ones. > >Most of the "instability" people complain about with the new 2.6 model >is caused by people not testing the -rc kernels before they are >released, so that they end up being released with regressions. > I think I have seen special live-cd distribution for KDE beta testers. Kernel is not a KDE but such a very broken distribution with -rc kernel could be more easily maintained than "udev forever!". Live-cd (or live-usb) wouldn't be too flexible - you can't say there "can you give a whirl to this patch, please" but I bet you will have more testers. thanks, Indrek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-04 15:30 [W:0.379 / U:0.650 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||