lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 16:12 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 08:11:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > If no-forced-inlining makes the kernel smaller then we probably have (yet
    > > more) incorrect inlining. We should hunt those down and fix them. We did
    > > quite a lot of this in 2.5.x/2.6.early. Didn't someone have a script which
    > > would identify which functions are a candidate for uninlining?
    >
    > It was a combination of a tool I wrote for -tiny, which added
    > deprecation warnings to inlines along with a post-processing tool to
    > count instantiations, nestings, etc., and a post-post-processing tool
    > written by Denis Vlasenko that guessed at the space usage.


    my current patch to deinline a bunch of big offenders is at
    http://www.fenrus.org/noinline

    (it's on the big side for lkml for now)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-31 10:22    [W:4.640 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site