Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:51:55 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7 |
| |
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > have you applied the zlib patches too? In particular this one should > make a difference: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/patches/reduce-zlib-stack-hack.patch > > If you didnt have this applied, could you apply it and retry with > stack-footprint-debugging again?
Ingo, instead of having a static work area and using locking, why not just move those fields into the "z_stream" structure, and thus make them be per-stream? The z_stream structure should already be allocated with kmalloc() or similar by the caller, so that also gets it off the stack without the locking thing.
Hmm?
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |