Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:07 +0300 | From | Alexander Shishckin <> | Subject | Re: Redefinition error while compiling LKM |
| |
On 12/29/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 16:51 +0530, pretorious . wrote: > > > > > >and.. why on earth would you need sys/syscall.h ?? (or sys/stat.h for > > >that matter) > > > > > > > > > > Trying to override certain syscalls (mknod ...) > > eeppp why?? > really don't do that! > > (overriding syscalls from modules really shouldn't be done.. there's a > reason the syscall table isn't exported!)
Perhaps during the 2.4.21 old days sys_call_table was still exported and there were plenty of 'How to intrecept a syscall in 10 minutes' documents in the wild.
-- I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |