lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ipw2200 stack reduction
    Hi,

    On 12/29/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
    > Well you could do that if you wanted, but 500 bytes of dynamic
    > allocation is not a big issue. But it could be an optimization on top of
    > this patch, indeed. The downside is that you then have to do 2
    > allocations for each command, so whether it would be a win or not I
    > don't know.

    The allocation shouldn't make much difference but for the implicit
    memset() smaller size is a win maybe?

    Pekka
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-29 11:44    [W:0.033 / U:0.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site