lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ipw2200 stack reduction
Hi,

On 12/29/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> Well you could do that if you wanted, but 500 bytes of dynamic
> allocation is not a big issue. But it could be an optimization on top of
> this patch, indeed. The downside is that you then have to do 2
> allocations for each command, so whether it would be a win or not I
> don't know.

The allocation shouldn't make much difference but for the implicit
memset() smaller size is a win maybe?

Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-29 11:44    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans