Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:39:23 +0200 | From | Pekka Enberg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ipw2200 stack reduction |
| |
Hi,
On 12/29/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote: > Well you could do that if you wanted, but 500 bytes of dynamic > allocation is not a big issue. But it could be an optimization on top of > this patch, indeed. The downside is that you then have to do 2 > allocations for each command, so whether it would be a win or not I > don't know.
The allocation shouldn't make much difference but for the implicit memset() smaller size is a win maybe?
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |