[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] updates XFS mutex patch
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christoph Hellwig <> wrote:
> > It's say just switch XFS to the one-arg mutex_init variant.
> >
> > And ingo. please add the mutex_t typedef, analogue to spinlock_t it's
> > a totally opaqueue to the users type, so it really should be a
> > typedef. After that the XFS mutex.h can just go away.
> that's not possible, due to DEFINE_MUTEX() and due to struct mutex being
> embedded in other structures. I dont think we want to lose that property
> of struct semaphore, and only restrict mutex usage to pointers.

Sorry, but I don't get this sentence at all. Can you try to rephrase it?
What does DEFINE_MUTEX have to do with declaring either a typedef or
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-29 18:14    [W:0.124 / U:2.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site