[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: USB rejecting sleep

    > > What exactly changed in the recent USB stacks that is causing it to
    > > abort system suspend much more often ? I'm getting lots of user reports
    > > with 2.6.15-rc5 saying that they can't put their internal laptops to
    > > sleep, apparently because a driver doesn't have a suspend method
    > > (internal bluetooth in this case).
    > >
    > > It's never been mandatory so far for all drivers of all connected
    > > devices to have a suspend method... didn't we decide back then that
    > > disconneting those was the right way to go ?
    > Yes it is, and I have a patch in my tree now that fixes this up and
    > keeps the suspend process working properly for usb drivers that do not
    > have a suspend function.
    > Hm, I wonder if it should go in for 2.6.15?

    It would be nice to have some fixes in 2.6.15, so we are
    not swamped with bugreports. Its a regression after all.

    Thanks, Sharp!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-26 10:20    [W:0.019 / U:1.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site