Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:19:19 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: USB rejecting sleep |
| |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:02:44PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > What exactly changed in the recent USB stacks that is causing it to > > > abort system suspend much more often ? I'm getting lots of user reports > > > with 2.6.15-rc5 saying that they can't put their internal laptops to > > > sleep, apparently because a driver doesn't have a suspend method > > > (internal bluetooth in this case). > > > > > > It's never been mandatory so far for all drivers of all connected > > > devices to have a suspend method... didn't we decide back then that > > > disconneting those was the right way to go ? > > > > Yes it is, and I have a patch in my tree now that fixes this up and > > keeps the suspend process working properly for usb drivers that do not > > have a suspend function. > > > > Hm, I wonder if it should go in for 2.6.15? > > It would be nice to have some fixes in 2.6.15, so we are > not swamped with bugreports. Its a regression after all.
It's already in 2.6.15-rc7.
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |