Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:30:32 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nfsd4_lock() returns bogus values to clients |
| |
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 06:49:33AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > Date: 1135493243 -0500 > > missing nfserror() in default case of a switch by return value of > posix_lock_file(); as the result we send negative host-endian to > clients that expect positive network-endian, preferably mentioned > in RFC... BTW, that case is not impossible - posix_lock_file() > can return -ENOLCK and we do not handle that one explicitly.
Gaack... s/nfserror/nfserrno/, of course... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |