[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4
    Nicolas Pitre <> wrote:
    > How can't you get the fact that semaphores could _never_ be as simple as
    > mutexes? This is a theoritical impossibility, which maybe turns out not
    > to be so true on x86, but which is damn true on ARM where the fast path
    > (the common case of a mutex) is significantly more efficient.

    I did notice your comments. I'll grant that mutexes will save some tens of
    fastpath cycles on one minor architecture. Sorry, but that doesn't seem
    very important.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-23 15:56    [W:0.021 / U:1.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site