Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | From | Bodo Eggert <> | | Date | Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:12:38 +0100 | | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks |
Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> wrote:
> "With some drawbacks" is the point: It has been determined that the > drawbacks are heavy enough that the 8KiB stack option should go.
Determined by voodoo and wild guessing.
Let's detect the need for 4K stacks: (I hope I found the correct place)
(Maybe the printk should be completely ifdefed, but I'm not sure)
Signed-off-by: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>
--- 2.6.14/kernel/fork.c.ori 2005-12-21 19:06:24.000000000 +0100 +++ 2.6.14/kernel/fork.c 2005-12-21 19:15:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -168,4 +168,9 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_stru if (!ti) { free_task_struct(tsk); + printk(KERN_WARNING, "Can't allocate new task structure" +#ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS + ". Maybe you could benefit from 4K stacks.\n" +#endif + "\n"); return NULL; } -- Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |