Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:11:42 -0500 | From | Brice Goglin <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla |
| |
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>non-bugzilla post-2.6.14 bugs which I've squirelled away include: >> >> >>From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> >>Subject: Linux 2.6.14: Badness in as-iosched >> >> > >As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression. > >Besides this, Jens (Cc'ed) sent a patch for it: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/20/119 > >Was there a reason why it wasn't applied? > > Jens also posted a different patch on http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/111 addressing my issue. It was supposed to go in -stable. But, from I see in changelogs, nothing went into -stable while something similar has been merged into rc3: http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;h=43fa2049568883d6b5c07cc304b77c93d3091abf;hp=fbe050124ec514431c19091d395fa9065b2398a4;hb=8ad9ebb391e4cd75837ee608b9c33fcaceda0bc2;f=block/as-iosched.c
Anyway, I did not reproduce my problem with the first patch that Jens sent (applied on top of 2.6.14). 2.6.15-rcX look fine too, but I am not sure I have stressed those kernels as much as 2.6.14.
Brice
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |