![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:49 am, Nix said: > Well, personally I handle patch-application in cp -al'ed trees by doing > cp -al via a script, and repatching all currently hardlinked trees > (obviously if they are very divergent some patches will fail and I'll > have to fix them up by hand). > > It works for me well enough to keep hardlinked branches going for in > some cases years without problems. Well the O= syntax is much nicer when using Git. You symply checkout the branch you're interested in and compile it; then switch to another, compile it, etc... Git makes checking out a brach lightning fast, it's very slick. Using the O= notation means you only have one branch checked out at a time and there's no need to have source files linked to a bunch of different directories. Cheers, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-21 09:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||