Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:33:29 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] include/linux/irq.h: #include <linux/smp.h> |
| |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:21:31PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > The point is _exactly_ as the above quotation between Andrew Morton > and myself. I'm sure it's not me being thick because it's absolutely > damned obvious from the above. > > Andrew said: "Yes, it's basically always wrong to include asm/foo.h > when linux/foo.h exists." > > That statement is a rule. I assert that this is an incorrect statement > and I assert that there is a proven case where this statement is incorrect. > > Hence, to avoid people reading Andrew's misleading statement, I followed > up on precisely _that_ point and _that_ point alone.
OK, now I got it:
You are arguing only against Andrew's statement of a general rule, not against my patch.
Sorry for my misunderstading.
> Russell King
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |