[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC: 2.6 patch] include/linux/irq.h: #include <linux/smp.h>
    On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:21:31PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > The point is _exactly_ as the above quotation between Andrew Morton
    > and myself. I'm sure it's not me being thick because it's absolutely
    > damned obvious from the above.
    > Andrew said: "Yes, it's basically always wrong to include asm/foo.h
    > when linux/foo.h exists."
    > That statement is a rule. I assert that this is an incorrect statement
    > and I assert that there is a proven case where this statement is incorrect.
    > Hence, to avoid people reading Andrew's misleading statement, I followed
    > up on precisely _that_ point and _that_ point alone.

    OK, now I got it:

    You are arguing only against Andrew's statement of a general rule,
    not against my patch.

    Sorry for my misunderstading.

    > Russell King



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-21 23:35    [W:0.020 / U:6.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site