Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:36:34 +0100 | From | Folkert van Heusden <> | Subject | Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ? |
| |
> > > Your results are interesting : size-32 seems to use objects of size 64 ! > > > > size-32 1538 2714 64 <<HERE>> > > > So I guess that size-32 cache could be avoided at least for EMT (I take you > > > run a 64 bits kernel ?) > > I think I do yes: > > Linux xxxxx 2.4.21-37.EL #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 13:32:18 EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > It is a redhat 4 x64 system. > Looks more like RHEL3 judging from the kernel version.
Ehr yes, you're totally right.
Folkert van Heusden
-- Try MultiTail! Multiple windows with logfiles, filtered with regular expressions, colored output, etc. etc. www.vanheusden.com/multitail/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get your PGP/GPG key signed at www.biglumber.com! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |