lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Light-weight dynamically extended stacks
From Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ...
DateWed, 21 Dec 2005 00:57:45 -0500
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:06 EST, Patrick McLean said:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > 
> > This is not intended to be an automatic scheme. To use it, you must
> > actually insert code into the troublesome codepaths, which will of
> > course serve as a red flag for code review.
> > 
> 
> It might be an idea to put in a #warn to make it an even bigger red 
> flag, and to really make people fix this rather than just ignore it 
> since it works with the dynamic stacks.

Stick a 'depends on CONFIG_BROKEN' on it? ;)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-21 07:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008