lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject[PATCH] cpu scheduler: unsquish dynamic priorities
    The problem:

    The current scheduler implementation maps 40 nice values and 10 bonus
    values into only 40 priority slots on the run queues. This results in
    the dynamic priorities of tasks at either end of the nice scale being
    squished up. E.g. all tasks with nice in the range -20 to -16 and the
    maximum of 10 bonus points will end up with a dynamic priority of
    MAX_RT_PRIO and all tasks with nice in the range 15 to 19 and no bonus
    points will end up with a dynamic priority of MAX_PRIO - 1.

    Although the fact that niceness is primarily implemented by time slice
    size means that this will have little or no adverse effect on the long
    term allocation of CPU resources due to niceness, it could adversely
    effect latency as it will interfere with preemption.

    The solution:

    Increase the number of priority slots in the run queues to allow a
    linear mapping and eliminate the squish.

    The implementation:

    As the only place MAX_PRIO is used outside of sched.c is to initialize
    the init task in init_task.h, it is possible to implement the solution
    entirely within sched.c by defining a new macro IDLE_PRIO (which is
    equal to the sum of MAX_PRIO and MAX_BONUS) and then replacing MAX_PRIO
    by IDLE_PRIO where appropriate.

    Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>

    --
    Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

    "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
    -- Ambrose Bierce
    Index: GIT-warnings/kernel/sched.c
    ===================================================================
    --- GIT-warnings.orig/kernel/sched.c 2005-12-20 13:02:45.000000000 +1100
    +++ GIT-warnings/kernel/sched.c 2005-12-20 13:04:02.000000000 +1100
    @@ -180,14 +180,15 @@ static unsigned int task_timeslice(task_
    * These are the runqueue data structures:
    */

    -#define BITMAP_SIZE ((((MAX_PRIO+1+7)/8)+sizeof(long)-1)/sizeof(long))
    +#define IDLE_PRIO (MAX_PRIO + MAX_BONUS)
    +#define BITMAP_SIZE ((((IDLE_PRIO+1+7)/8)+sizeof(long)-1)/sizeof(long))

    typedef struct runqueue runqueue_t;

    struct prio_array {
    unsigned int nr_active;
    unsigned long bitmap[BITMAP_SIZE];
    - struct list_head queue[MAX_PRIO];
    + struct list_head queue[IDLE_PRIO];
    };

    /*
    @@ -645,18 +646,15 @@ static inline void enqueue_task_head(str
    */
    static int effective_prio(task_t *p)
    {
    - int bonus, prio;
    + int prio;

    if (rt_task(p))
    return p->prio;

    - bonus = CURRENT_BONUS(p) - MAX_BONUS / 2;
    + prio = p->static_prio + MAX_BONUS - CURRENT_BONUS(p);
    + BUG_ON(prio < MAX_RT_PRIO);
    + BUG_ON(prio > IDLE_PRIO - 1);

    - prio = p->static_prio - bonus;
    - if (prio < MAX_RT_PRIO)
    - prio = MAX_RT_PRIO;
    - if (prio > MAX_PRIO-1)
    - prio = MAX_PRIO-1;
    return prio;
    }

    @@ -1861,7 +1859,7 @@ void pull_task(runqueue_t *src_rq, prio_
    p->timestamp = (p->timestamp - src_rq->timestamp_last_tick)
    + this_rq->timestamp_last_tick;
    /*
    - * Note that idle threads have a prio of MAX_PRIO, for this test
    + * Note that idle threads have a prio of IDLE_PRIO, for this test
    * to be always true for them.
    */
    if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, this_rq))
    @@ -1945,8 +1943,8 @@ skip_bitmap:
    if (!idx)
    idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
    else
    - idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_PRIO, idx);
    - if (idx >= MAX_PRIO) {
    + idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, IDLE_PRIO, idx);
    + if (idx >= IDLE_PRIO) {
    if (array == busiest->expired && busiest->active->nr_active) {
    array = busiest->active;
    dst_array = this_rq->active;
    @@ -3056,7 +3054,7 @@ go_idle:
    rq->expired = array;
    array = rq->active;
    rq->expired_timestamp = 0;
    - rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;
    + rq->best_expired_prio = IDLE_PRIO;
    }

    idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
    @@ -4396,7 +4394,7 @@ void __devinit init_idle(task_t *idle, i

    idle->sleep_avg = 0;
    idle->array = NULL;
    - idle->prio = MAX_PRIO;
    + idle->prio = IDLE_PRIO;
    idle->state = TASK_RUNNING;
    idle->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
    set_task_cpu(idle, cpu);
    @@ -4737,7 +4735,7 @@ static void migrate_dead_tasks(unsigned
    struct runqueue *rq = cpu_rq(dead_cpu);

    for (arr = 0; arr < 2; arr++) {
    - for (i = 0; i < MAX_PRIO; i++) {
    + for (i = 0; i < IDLE_PRIO; i++) {
    struct list_head *list = &rq->arrays[arr].queue[i];
    while (!list_empty(list))
    migrate_dead(dead_cpu,
    @@ -4793,7 +4791,7 @@ static int migration_call(struct notifie
    /* Idle task back to normal (off runqueue, low prio) */
    rq = task_rq_lock(rq->idle, &flags);
    deactivate_task(rq->idle, rq);
    - rq->idle->static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
    + rq->idle->static_prio = IDLE_PRIO;
    __setscheduler(rq->idle, SCHED_NORMAL, 0);
    migrate_dead_tasks(cpu);
    task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
    @@ -5610,7 +5608,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
    rq->nr_running = 0;
    rq->active = rq->arrays;
    rq->expired = rq->arrays + 1;
    - rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;
    + rq->best_expired_prio = IDLE_PRIO;

    #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
    rq->sd = NULL;
    @@ -5625,12 +5623,12 @@ void __init sched_init(void)

    for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
    array = rq->arrays + j;
    - for (k = 0; k < MAX_PRIO; k++) {
    + for (k = 0; k < IDLE_PRIO; k++) {
    INIT_LIST_HEAD(array->queue + k);
    __clear_bit(k, array->bitmap);
    }
    // delimiter for bitsearch
    - __set_bit(MAX_PRIO, array->bitmap);
    + __set_bit(IDLE_PRIO, array->bitmap);
    }
    }
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-20 05:55    [W:0.027 / U:59.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site